Study on the Choking Model for Elimination of Severe Slugging in Offshore Oil and Gas Fields

XU Luhan; YAN Yiwei; WU Quanhong; DU Yaohua; WANG Hanxuan; ZOU Suifeng

doi:10.21656/1000-0887.460140

Volume 47 Issue 6

Jun. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Applied Mathematics and Mechanics > 2026 > 47(6): 773-786

XU Luhan, YAN Yiwei, WU Quanhong, DU Yaohua, WANG Hanxuan, ZOU Suifeng. Study on the Choking Model for Elimination of Severe Slugging in Offshore Oil and Gas Fields[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 773-786. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460140

Citation:

PDF( 4240 KB)

Study on the Choking Model for Elimination of Severe Slugging in Offshore Oil and Gas Fields

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460140

XU Luhan^1
,,
YAN Yiwei¹,
WU Quanhong^{2, 3},
DU Yaohua¹,
WANG Hanxuan¹,
ZOU Suifeng^{1
,
,}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, P. R. China
2.
Longyuan(Beijing) New Energy Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100034, P. R. China
3.
National Energy Wind Power Operation Technology R&D Center, Xi'an 710309, P. R. China

Received Date: 2025-08-01
Rev Recd Date: 2026-05-11
Publish Date: 2026-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were performed to establish a model for predicting the valve opening of the topside choking method for elimination of severe slugging in offshore oil and gas pipeline-riser systems. Based on the outflow characteristics of liquid slug at the riser top at the flow regime transition, which can be regarded as those of transient single-phase liquid flow, the condition for gas-liquid blowout mitigation was determined, i.e. the peak value of pressure drop across the valve shall be twice its time-average value just at the elimination moment of severe slugging, corresponding to the transient single-phase liquid flow. Then, the target resistant factor and the flow coefficient were derived successively according to the defined equations. Finally, the valve opening was worked out according to either the specification document of the valve or the calibration of the flow characteristics of the valve. The prediction model innovatively correlates the peak pressure drop across the choke valve with the physical process of instantaneous single-phase flow, resolving the inconsistency of mapping averaged 2-phase parameters to single-phase valve characteristics in conventional models. The average deviation of prediction for 2 experimental loops (150-m/DN 50 and 380-m/DN 80) is +0.55% and +1.8%, respectively, for experimental data from 2 experimental pipelines; while the deviation from automatic control result is smaller than ±2% in a field case. The established model can guide manual operations and serve as a setpoint for automatic control systems in offshore fields.
- 2-phase flow,
- severe slugging,
- topside choking,
- resistant factor

(Contributed by ZOU Suifeng, Member of the Youth Editorial Board of AMM)

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	LI X, XUE Y, DU H, et al. Investigation on leakage detection and localization in gas-liquid stratified flow pipelines based on acoustic method[J]. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2022, 2(4): 100089. doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100089
[2]	SCHMIDT Z. Experimental study of two-phase slug flow in a pipeline-riser pipe system[D]. Tulsa, USA: The University of Tulsa, 1977.
[3]	MALEKZADEH R, HENKES R A W M, MUDDE R F. Severe slugging in a long pipeline-riser system: experiments and predictions[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 46: 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.06.004
[4]	BANJARA V, PEREYRA E, AVILA C, et al. Improved severe slugging modeling and mapping[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025, 244: 213446. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213446
[5]	LIU T, ZOU S, WANG H, et al. Cyclic flow cut-off characteristics of gas-liquid two-phase flow in pipeline-riser system and prediction of its occurring condition[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2025, 182: 105042. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.105042
[6]	张西迎, 李乃良, 陈冰清. 文昌油田集输-S形立管内严重段塞流的分析与控制[J]. 油气储运, 2019, 38(4): 472-480. ZHANG Xiying, LI Nailiang, CHEN Bingqing. Analysis and treatment on the severe slug flow in pipeline S-shaped riser of Wenchang Oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2019, 38(4): 472-480. (in Chinese)
[7]	PEDERSEN S, DURDEVIC P, YANG Z. Challenges in slug modeling and control for offshore oil and gas productions: a review study[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 88: 270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.07.018
[8]	李清平, 姚海元, 程兵. 深水流动安全保障技术[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2021: 1-7. LI Qingping, YAO Haiyuan, CHENG Bing, et al. Flow Assurance for Deepwater Oil and Gas Fields[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2021: 1-7. (in Chinese)
[9]	HENRIOT V, COURBOT A, HEINTZÉ E, et al. Simulation of process to control severe slugging: application to the Dunbar pipeline[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas. Richardson: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1999: SPE-56461-MS.
[10]	HAVRE K, DALSMO M. Active feedback control as a solution to severe slugging[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 2002, 17(3): 138-148.
[11]	陈学锋. SZ36-1油田海管段塞流处理技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油学院, 2005. CHEN Xuefeng. Study on solution to slugging in offshore pipeline in SZ36-1 oil field[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2005. (in Chinese)
[12]	姜安, 宁永庚. 渤南油气田海底管道段塞流对友谊号原油处理流程的影响及防止措施[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(2): 351-353. JIANG An, NING Yonggeng. Influence of slugging in subsea pipeline on the process of crude oil in "Bohai Youyi" fpso in bonan oil and gas field and preventive measures[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(2): 351-353. (in Chinese)
[13]	李忠亮, 罗京, 卢进良. BZ25-1油田段塞流影响分析和应对措施的应用[J]. 中国造船, 2012, 53(S2): 310-315. LI Zhongliang, LUO Jing, LU Jinliang. Application and analysis about affection and treatment of slug flow in BZ25-1 oil field[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2012, 53(S2): 310-315. (in Chinese)
[14]	郭庆丰. 严重段塞流对JZ25-1S油田群生产的影响及对策[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2014, 29(6): 5-9. GUO Qingfeng. The influence of sever slugging to the production of JZ25-1S oilfield group and its countermeasures[J]. China Offshore Platform, 2014, 29(6): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[15]	李长俊, 吴畏, 张黎. 渤西油田严重段塞流控制措施数值模拟[J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(1): 95-100. LI Changjun, WU Wei, ZHANG Li. Numerical simulation on control measures of severe slug flow in Boxi Oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(1): 95-100. (in Chinese)
[16]	NNABUIFE S G, TANDOH H, WHIDBORNE J F. Slug flow control using topside measurements: a review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 2022, 9: 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100204
[17]	OGAZI A. Multiphase severe slug control[D]. Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University, 2011.
[18]	JAHANSHAHI E, SKOGESTAD S. Simplified dynamical models for control of severe slugging in multiphase risers[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2011, 44(1): 1634-1639. doi: 10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.00981
[19]	PARK K H, KIM T W, KIM Y J, et al. Experimental investigation of model-based IMC control of severe slugging[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 204: 108732. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108732
[20]	WANG H, ZOU S, LIU T, et al. Experimental investigation of online solving for critical valve opening for eliminating severe slugging in pipeline-riser systems[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2024, 110: 109584. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109584
[21]	TAITEL Y. Stability of severe slugging[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1986, 12(2): 203-217. doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(86)90026-1
[22]	JANSEN F E, SHOHAM O, TAITEL Y. The elimination of severe slugging: experiments and modeling[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22(6): 1055-1072. doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(96)00027-4
[23]	FADAIRO A, OBI C, LING K, et al. An improved model for severe slugging stability criteria in offshore pipeline-riser systems[J]. Petroleum Research, 2022, 7(3): 318-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.11.005
[24]	FU J, WU Q, SUN J, et al. The prediction of the valve opening required for slugging control in offshore pipeline risers based on empirical closures and valve characteristics[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(5): 981. doi: 10.3390/jmse13050981
[25]	ZOU S, YAO T, GUO L, et al. Non-uniformity of gas/liquid flow in a riser and impact of operation and pipe configuration on slugging characteristics[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 96: 329-346. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.03.021
[26]	孔祥伟, 林元华, 邱伊婕, 等. 气侵钻井过程中井底衡压的节流阀开度控制研究[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2014, 35(5): 572-580. doi: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2014.05.011 KONG Xiangwei, LIN Yuanhua, QIU Yijie, et al. Research on the throttle valve opening degree control to keep bottomhole pressure in balance when gas influx occurs during drilling operations[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2014, 35(5): 572-580. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2014.05.011
[27]	杨鹏飞, 毛良杰, 杨森, 等. 基于井筒多相流理论的复杂结构井动态压井过程中的井筒压力研究[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2025, 46(2): 254-270. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450061 YANG Pengfei, MAO Liangjie, YANG Sen, et al. Research on wellbore pressure in the dynamic killing process for complex structure wells based on the wellbore multiphase flow theory[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 254-270. (in Chinese) doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450061
[28]	SHI H, HOLMES J A, DURLOFSKY L J, et al. Drift-flux modeling of two-phase flow in wellbores[J]. SPE Journal, 2005, 10(1): 24-33. doi: 10.2118/84228-PA
[29]	许路寒, 杨博, 邹遂丰, 等. 节流阀安装位置对严重段塞流调控效果影响研究[C]//2024年中国工程热物理学会多相流学术会议论文集. 天津: 中国工程热物理学会, 2024: 65-036. XU Luhan, YANG Bo, ZOU Suifeng, et al. Study on effects of valve installation position on control of severe slugging control[C]//Proceedings of 2024 CSET Multiphase Flow Conference. Tianjin: Chinese Society of Engineering Thermophysics, 2024: 65-036. (in Chinese)